Skip to main content

Reply to this post | See parent post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: unclejohn52 Date: Jan 26, 2011 12:51pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: State of the Union (Dead related)

I wavered too, I think we all did. But I went for it. My rationale - I do NOT have all the official releases (RTs, DPs) - in fact, very few of them. I'm playing catch-up.

An art director friend of mine once said: "if your hand doesn't shake when you write the invoice, you're not charging enough."

I think Rhino had the shakes before this release, only to find that it didn't scare too many people at all!

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: srtg83 Date: Jan 26, 2011 9:26pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: State of the Union (Dead related)

Do not worry about the newbies who are generally younger and more computer savy than us old farts. This release will be online within days of its release, as are all other official releases.

In my view, the way this release was handled was a major screw-up by Rhino. I can not believe they did not learn from the FW'69 limited release. Demand was seriously underestimated resulting in a significant transfer of profits from Rhino to the re-sellers. The same thing is happening here. The absurd threat that a certain number must be sold by what April further proves this point. These guys have no clue...heads should roll for this.

Let's see if they learn. Clearly, full tours or at least legs of tours are in demand. Sure, label these as limited releases but set the limit at 25k per release. I'd say release all multi-tracks in the full tour format within a 3-5 year period.

Cliff is right. This is a game-changer. Let's see what happens next.